After 54 years of printing hot gossip and randy rumors, the Globe apparently published it's very first true story this week concerning the mystery of Barack Obama's birth. The supermarket tabloid's cover dated December 9th states "Obama Election Illegal" in huge type. In another history breaking moment, that headline alone may prove to be enough to cause this crazed conservative to shell out the $2 or $3 necessary to see what's on the inside because their website only posts this teaser.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
The Globe on Obama's Citizenship
After 54 years of printing hot gossip and randy rumors, the Globe apparently published it's very first true story this week concerning the mystery of Barack Obama's birth. The supermarket tabloid's cover dated December 9th states "Obama Election Illegal" in huge type. In another history breaking moment, that headline alone may prove to be enough to cause this crazed conservative to shell out the $2 or $3 necessary to see what's on the inside because their website only posts this teaser.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
This story has been proven FALSE over and over...please move on from spreading disinformation about our next PRESIDENT. He was born in Hawaii, and this FACT has been checked out both by the state of Hawaii and Factcheck.org. Stop spreading lies and accept the fact the Barack Obama will become President of the United States in January.
54 years and you feel they're telling the truth today because you both share the same whacked viewpoint?
The "change YOU could believe in" is not gonna come from The Globe.
Unless of course you think the Globe knows something that the FBI, CIA, NSA, State Dept, FEC, DNC, RNC and about 20 other agencies don't.
It's odd that some of you anonymous posters are a little too serious and can't take a bit of tongue in cheek humor.
Funny, I find it equally as odd that you'd expect critics to even consider that you provided this article as a joke.
In light of your support of the various ill-conceived court actions, I think it's completely reasonable you also believe in the globe.
I'm still waiting for Berg's evidence about 9-11. It's been years now.
Then, like now, a "we've got evidence!" cry produced many naive people and their donations.
Ultimately none saw satisfaction and Berg made off with their dough.
Since then, Berg has been sanctioned fines, sued by ex-clients and heavily criticized by far more honest and successful lawyers and judges.
Really, John.
If it walks like a duck, why ignore all the quacking?
It IS a duck!
Hiding behind the name Anonymous displays a fair amount of cowardice. Granted, I'm not a big Obama fan but if you learned to read rather than just spouting Obotic propaganda, you'd realize that I'm not a fan of Phillip Berg or Andy Martin either. They are both opportunistic grandstanders seeking personal notoriety. But I am a patriot and a huge fan of the U.S. Constitution which I feel needs to be upheld at any cost.
John,
I'm anonymous for reasons that the truth doesn't need a name.
It can stand by itself.
Equally, knowing your name provides no assurance of your courage.
Cowardice and courage have little to do with truth.
Possibly in the fight for it, but truth is empirical.
Here's the thing that I don't understand..
We have a state authority and several other hugely capable and empowered authorities whose very jobs are contingent on accuracy.
One can easily say they're a patriot here, but by saying so in this issue, aren't they also saying they don't actually believe in many of the long established depts of the government?
You ride.. you've been pulled over by a cop before.
Did you ask him for his BC or who his CO was then?
No, you assumed that the cop was real by virtue of all the other things that supported it.
ie: he was dressed like a cop, rode a bike or patrol car, had a badge, gun and spoke like a cop.
Well that worked for you, right?
Ok, well what IF that cop wasn't really a cop?
The man stopped you and had a gun.
Surely his immediate threat was larger than Obama's presidency to you at that moment.
If that cop wasn't real, he could have just shot you.
Yet surely you pulled over and gave him YOUR ID.
That's my point.
There are SOOO many clues here to back up that the guy's been vetted.
Even his opponents in the RNC have not questioned it.
Surely they have money, lawyers, standing and something to gain.
Yet... nothing. Nothing at all.
Finally, Obama doesn't have to prove anything to anyone except the FEC and other entities.
If he showed his ID now (which he has no access to directly anyways), he'd set a precedent that all whacked people who sue for such items have standing.
Indeed, he has never even answered any claims.
He doesn't have to.
He's following the law and the law is backing him up all the way to the supreme court.
That's the funny thing too-
We have Bergbots and others saying he's spent a bunch of money fighting these claims.
That's hogwash.
He's spent nothing because he's not had to answer.
There's been no replies and thus no need for legal involvement on his behalf.
After all, where is ANY evidence of ANY fight?
Fights are messy and there's no mess at all.
The MSM *loves* fights too.
So if there's some suppressed or "underground" fight happening, it would again suggest one doesn't trust the US courts and authorities since they must be the ones hiding it.
Really.. nothing is hidden here.
Privacy laws long established are in place that work both for you and me.
I can't go out and get your SS# or birth record either.
I have no right to it because I was not entrusted to that right.
In this case, a Hawaiian state official is in charge of BC's and they said, under penalty of perjury, loss of employment and very likely incarceration... Obama was born in HI.
If you don't trust that official, what other officials DO give allegiance to blindly?
DMV? Insurance? Police? IRS?
Why accept some officials and not others?
Post a Comment